Background The Atellica® CI Analyzer is an automated, high-throughput integrated chemistry and immunoassay analyzer utilizing both Atellica® CH and Atellica® IM Assays. This study evaluated the analytical performance of the Atellica CH Amphetamines (Amp), Barbiturates (Brb), Benzodiazepine (Bnz), Cannabinoids THC (Thc), Cocaine Metabolite (Coc), Ecstasy (Xtc), Methadone (Mdn), Opiates (Op), Oxycodone (OXY), Phencyclidine (Pcp), and Propoxyphene (Ppx) Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer. Methods Precision and method comparison (MC) studies were used as performance indicators. Precision studies were performed according to CLSI EP05-A3 using quality control (QC) samples consisting of contrived human urine samples. One aliquot of each QC was tested in duplicate in two runs per day ≥2 hours apart on each analyzer for ≥ 20 days. Precision for each assay was evaluated with one reagent lot on one system. Method comparison studies were performed with three reagent lots according to CLSI EP12-A2. Individual native and contrived human urine samples were analyzed using the Atellica CH Amp, Barb, Bnz, Thc, Coc, Xtc, Mdn, Op, OXY, Pcp, and Ppx Assays on both the Atellica CH and Atellica CI Analyzers. The results were assessed based on analyte values used for distinguishing positive (value ≥cutoff) and negative (value <cutoff) specimens. Results As shown in table below, repeatability and within-lab %CVs based on manufacturer arbitrary units (mAU) were <0.8% and <3.2%, respectively or qualitative interpretation for each replicate remained unchanged for all 80 precision testing measurements (OXY, PcP). Qualitative accuracy assessed by concordance analysis demonstrated ≥95% agreement between the Atellica CI Analyzer and Atellica CH Analyzer. Conclusions Evaluation of the Atellica CH Amp, Barb, Bnz, Thc, Coc, Xtc, Mdn, Op, OXY, Pcp, and Ppx Assays using the Atellica CI Analyzer demonstrated acceptable precision and equivalent performance compared to the same assays on the Atellica CH Analyzer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewisch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: