Many perceive their digital media use to be out of balance and cope by recalibrating and reducing their use. One prominent goal of such digital disconnection is to improve well-being, yet past studies have yielded inconsistent results on whether this is an effective strategy. We test the associations of digital disconnection with a set of positive, negative, and social indicators of well-being in a two-week experience sampling study. N = 237 digital media users reported on T = 12,407 situations in their daily lives. Results show that in situations in which participants disconnected more than usual, they reported higher levels of affective well-being, energy, and social connectedness (within-person effects). In contrast, those who generally disconnected more than others reported no differences in well-being (between-person effects). Intrinsic motivation for disconnection positively moderated the associations with affective well-being, energy, and social connectedness between persons. Disconnection was not related to perceived stress, neither within nor between persons. The study further explores whether well-being effects differ depending on the aspects of digital media participants disconnected from. Overall, findings demonstrate how disconnection can be understood as a dynamic calibration of digital media (non-)use to achieve momentary – but not necessarily lasting – improvements in well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilbert et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: