PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2024JCO Oncology Practice

Patient and provider perceptions of the benefits and limitations of implementing ePRO-driven remote symptom monitoring into real-world cancer care settings.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CSCatherine C. SmithNHNicole L. HendersonTPTanvi Padalkar

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e56f65b6db64358750f90bhttps://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.325
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Populations2026
  2. 2Impact of real-world remote symptom monitoring program on hospitalizations and ICU admissions.2024
  3. 3Trajectory of symptoms reported in remote symptom monitoring over the course of oncology treatment for lung cancer.2024
  4. 4Implementation of a remote symptom monitoring pathway in oncology care: analysis of real-world experience across 33 cancer centres in France and Belgium2024 · 20 citations
  5. 5P1.068. Design Features of PRO-Based Remote Symptom Monitoring Interventions With Alert-Triggered Clinical Response in Cancer RCTs: A Systematic Review2026