Metabolite concentration estimates from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) are typically quantified using water referencing, correcting for relaxation time differences between metabolites and water. One common approach is to correct the water reference signal for differential relaxation within three tissue compartments (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) using fixed literature values. However, water relaxation times (T1 and T2) vary between brain locations, in pathology, and with age. MRS studies, even those measuring metabolite levels across the lifespan, often ignore these effects, because of a lack of reference data. The purpose of this study is to develop a water relaxometry atlas and to integrate location and age appropriate relaxation values into the MRS analysis workflow. 101 volunteers (51 men, 50 women; ~10 male and 10 female participants per decade (from the 20s to 60s), were recruited. T1 weighted MPRAGE images ((1 mm)3 isotropic resolution) were acquired. Whole brain water T1 and T2 measurements were made with DESPOT ((1.4 mm)3 isotropic resolution). T1 and T2 maps were registered to the JHU MNI-SS/EVE atlas using affine and LDDMM transformation. The atlas's 268 parcels were reduced to 130 by combining homologous parcels. Mean T1 and T2 values were calculated for each parcel in each subject. Linear models of T1 and T2 as functions of age were computed, using age minus 30 as the predictor. Reference atlases of age 30 intercept and age-slope for T1 and T2 were generated. The atlas-based workflow was integrated into Osprey, which coregisters MRS voxels to the atlas and calculates location and age appropriate water relaxation parameters for quantification. The water relaxation aging atlas revealed significant regional and tissue differences in water relaxation behavior across adulthood. Using location and subject appropriate reference values in the MRS analysis workflow removes a current methodological limitation and is expected to reduce quantification biases associated with water referenced tissue correction, especially for studies of aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simegn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: