Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of < 30%. Methods Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years), with a primary HF diagnosis, ≥1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of < 30%, and a BNP > 100 pg/mL within one year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16–25%, and 26–29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Results Overall, 2 184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF (≤15%, n = 468 [21.4%]; 16–25%, n = 1399 [64.1%]; and 26–29%, n = 317 [14.5%]). Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although one-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors (vs. LVEF 26–29% [referent]): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR)=1.92, p < 0.0001; and 16–25%, HR = 1.42, p = 0.01), mortality was similar by 3-years. HF hospitalizations at 1- and 3-years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs—driven by increased HF outpatient costs—were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤ 15%. Conclusions Patients with an LVEF of ≤ 15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: