Analyzes regulatory needs and proposes pathways for generative AI in judicial decision-making, suggesting vital frameworks.
With the rapid development of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, its potential applications in the field of judicial decision-making are becoming increasingly apparent. This paper explores the current state of generative AI in judicial rulings, highlighting its advantages and challenges, and analyzes the corresponding regulatory needs. By constructing a theoretical framework, the paper proposes regulatory paths suitable for this field, including the establishment of a legal framework, the design of regulatory mechanisms, and the promotion of social participation. Through the study of relevant domestic and international cases, this paper aims to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the standardized application of generative AI, thereby promoting its safe and efficient development in the judicial domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang Feng (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: