PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2024Lara D. Veeken3 citations

Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderately active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate

View Full Paper
MBMaya H BuchVersus ArthritisDWDavid WalkerNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCEChristopher J EdwardsUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Clinical trials restricted to moderately active RA are limited. Filgotinib is approved for treating moderate to severe active RA. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of filgotinib in moderately active RA. Methods In FINCH 1, patients with active moderate to severe RA and inadequate response to methotrexate received filgotinib 200 mg or 100 mg (FIL200/FIL100) once daily, adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks, or placebo, all with methotrexate (n = 1,755). This subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with a moderate baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP; 3.2 to ≤ 5.1; n = 425 24.2%). Results A higher proportion of patients achieved DAS28-CRP 2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (≤2.8), low disease activity (LDA) (DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 or CDAI ≤10), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) responses with FIL200 and FIL100 vs placebo at Weeks 12 and 24. Week 12 ACR20 response rates (primary end point) were 77.9%, 67.8%, and 43.8%, respectively. ∼75% of patients achieved DAS28-CRP LDA by week 24 with either filgotinib dose. FIL200 and FIL100 elicited greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes than placebo. The efficacy of filgotinib, maintained through week 52, was comparable to that of adalimumab. Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar with filgotinib and adalimumab. Infections were the most common AEs; incidence rates were 40–53% in active treatment groups. Conclusion In this subpopulation with moderately active RA, the efficacy and safety of filgotinib were similar to those in the overall FINCH 1 population (patients with active moderate to severe RA). Trial registration NCT02889796

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buch et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e572cdb6db643587513662https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae486
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of Filgotinib vs Placebo on Clinical Response in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy2019 · 335 citations
  2. 2Anti-TNF treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate disease activity: a prospective observational multicentre study (MODERATE).2017 · 16 citations
  3. 3The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)1992 · 30,129 citations
  4. 4POS0449 BIOLOGICS INITIATION IN MODERATE VS SEVERE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS: PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY FROM A CANADIAN REGISTRY2021 · 2 citations
  5. 5The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation.2003 · 1,524 citations