Background The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in cases with breast cancer is considered a bad prognostic sign. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) versus unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UE-MRI + DBT) in predicting LVI in women with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. Methods This prospective self-controlled study enrolled a total of 70 cases of pathologically proven breast cancer. All the patients underwent tomosynthesis, non-contrast, and post-contrast MRI. Depending on the broken halo sign seen in tomosynthesis, peritumoral edema, dark rim diffusion at diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values evaluated in MRI. Results The accuracy of LVI detection by tomosynthesis was 58%; unenhanced and enhanced MRI had the same results at 60%. The accuracy of detecting LVI was raised to 64% by combining the tomosynthesis results with unenhanced MRI. Conclusions Tomosynthesis parameters are promising tools in detecting LVI in breast cancer with better diagnostic accuracy in combination with unenhanced MRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hefida et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: