Tables serve as a widely adopted data format, attracting considerable academic interest concerning semantic understanding and logical inference of tables. In recent years, the prevailing paradigm of pre-training and fine-tuning on tabular data has become increasingly prominent in research on table understanding. However, existing table-based pre-training methods frequently exhibit constraints, supporting only single tasks while requiring substantial computational resources, which hinders their efficiency and applicability. In this paper, we introduce the TabMoE, a novel framework based on mixture-of-experts, designed to handle a wide range of tasks involving logical reasoning over tabular data. Each expert within the model specializes in a distinct logical function and is trained through the utilization of a hard Expectation–Maximization algorithm. Remarkably, this framework eliminates the necessity of dependency on tabular pre-training, instead exclusively employing limited task-specific data to significantly enhance models’ inferential capabilities. We conduct empirical experiments across three typical tasks related to tabular data: table-based question answering, table-based fact verification, and table-to-text generation. The experimental results underscore the innovation and feasibility of our framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: