PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2024Neuro-Oncology Practice6 citationsOpen Access

Actionable alterations in glioblastoma: insights from the implementation of genomic profiling as the standard of care from 2016 to 2023

View Full Paper
VFVincent FougnerCopenhagen University HospitalTUThomas UrupRigshospitaletHPHans Skovgaard PoulsenCopenhagen University Hospital

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background In 2016, genomic profiling was implemented for patients with grade 4 primary brain tumors at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The aim of this study was to discover actionable alterations and to match these with targeted therapies. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2023, 483 brain tumor patients were profiled. We retrieved clinical data and molecular data. Whole exome, whole genome, or panel sequencing, along with SNP array analyses, and RNA-seq were performed on resected primary tumor tissue. Alterations were classified according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) following the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on rational molecular testing. Results A total of 200 (41.4%) patients’ tumors harbored an alteration of interest according to the EANO guideline. Twenty (4.1%) patients had an ESCAT high-tier alteration (tier I or II), while 155 patients (32.1%) had an alteration corresponding to ESCAT IIIA. Thirty-five patients (7.2%) had an actionable alteration, and 15 (3.1%) received targeted therapy. The treated targets were BRAFV600E mutations, FGFR alterations, NTRK fusions, PDGFRA fusions, PTPRZ1-MET fusions, and TMB-high. The overall response rate was 20%, with a median duration of response of 12 months, and 47% achieved stable disease as the best response. Conclusions Genomic profiling uncovers alterations of interest in a substantial number of patients, but only a minority are considered by the Danish National Molecular Tumor Board to have actionable alterations, and even fewer receive targeted therapy. Nevertheless, factors, such as promising targets and the increasing availability of trials, may contribute to a future increase in the number of patients benefiting from targeted therapies based on genomic profiling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fougner et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57799b6db643587517a60https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1STAR-Fusion: Fast and Accurate Fusion Transcript Detection from RNA-Seq2017 · 297 citations
  2. 2Whole genome sequencing in oncology: using scenario drafting to explore future developments2021 · 21 citations
  3. 3Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de los tumores intracraneales2009 · 5,288 citations
  4. 4Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways2008 · 7,866 citations
  5. 5The Glioma-IRE project − Molecular profiling in patients with glioma: steps toward an individualized diagnostic and therapeutic approach2023 · 13 citations