Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thailand’s National Malaria Elimination Strategy, 2017–2026, aims to reach zero indigenous transmission by 2024. During 2016–2021, Thailand had successfully reduced its malaria burden by more than 80%. However, a resurgence of malaria in 2022 saw an increase in the incidence in 33 provinces. To identify the predictors of malaria epidemic re-occurring in malaria-free areas, secondary data of malaria-reintroduced villages in 2022 were obtained from the Malaria Information System. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to compare characteristics, prevention, and response measures between villages with and without sustained local transmission after malaria reintroduction. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the associations between sustained local transmission and potential predictors. Among the transmission foci in 2022, 336 villages had previously been malaria-free, of which 73 (21.7%) reported sustained local transmission. A multi-level logistic regression model, considering villages clustered within provinces, found that villages located in a district which contained active foci (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.05) and having a higher proportion of non-Thai cases (AOR 12.3, 95% CI 5.69–26.6) were significantly associated with sustained local transmission whereas coverage of malaria control within 7 days was protective (AOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.44). Areas with high migrant populations were associated with a higher risk of malaria reintroduction. Proactive case search should target these populations to quickly detect reintroduced cases and conduct timely control to prevent further local transmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darin Areechokchai (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: