Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, often characterized by pruritic hives, can significantly impact quality of life [1][4]. Standard treatment involves second-generation antihistamines, but some cases may become refractory, requiring stronger medications such as cyclosporine A [2]. Purpose: To investigate the association of allergic conjunctivitis alongside CSU and use of cyclosporine A compared to those without pre-existing AC in treating CSU, using TrinetX database. Methods: Analysis included ICD-10 codes ‘urticaria, unspecified, ‘idiopathic urticaria,’ or ‘other urticaria’ for patients seen during 2020-2024, with at least two consecutive visits at least 4-6 weeks apart, in addition to receiving a second-generation H1-antihistamine treatment. Compare prevalence of cyclosporine use between two cohorts: AC (+) x urticaria x pretreated with H1 and AC (-) x urticaria x pretreated with H1 and patients with and without AC, requiring the addition of cyclosporine A to H1 for treatment of CSU over an observation period of 5 years. Propensity score matching to pair the two cohorts for age, sex, and race [3]. Results: In AC (+) x urticaria x pretreated with H1 group, there were 38,530 patients, out of which 446 required the addition of cyclosporine treatment, resulting in a risk percentage of 1.158%. In AC (-) x urticaria x pretreated with second-generation antihistamine group, with 415,786 patients, 2,812 required the addition of cyclosporine treatment, resulting in a lower risk percentage of 0.676%. Risk Ratio (RR) is calculated as 1.711, with a 95% confidence interval of (1.55, 1.89). Conclusion: A greater proportion of CSU patients with AC required cyclosporine compared to those without AC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: