Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this paper is to find a better match between the supply of and demand for solidarity microcredit with a view to reducing the level of precariousness and vulnerability of micro-entrepreneurs. If microcredit can constitute a necessary production factor for the activity of micro-entrepreneurs, then the deployment of MFIs in developing countries to facilitate access to microfinance services for low-income agents is desirable. However, the effectiveness of such a factor requires a good analysis of the cash flow needs of micro-entrepreneurs (households) in precarious situations, which would enable financial products to be adapted. Two main lessons can be drawn from a theoretical model: (1) demand for microcredit depends not only on the cost of the service, but also on the price of the micro-entrepreneur's output, the price of labour input and the size of the business. And, although they have this labour input, micro-entrepreneurs suffer from a lack of financial means to exploit it in order to benefit from it and improve their living conditions. (2) solidarity microcredit can have a positive impact on household cash flow, improve the smoothing of their consumption and, to a certain extent, strengthen their resistance to economic shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamou et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: