⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

September 17, 2024Journal of Clinical MedicineOpen Access

Dosimetric Comparison between the HyperArc and Conventional VMAT in Cervical Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Jeehoon Park Byungdo Park Jeongho Kim

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the usability of the HyperArc (HA) technique in stereotactic radiosurgery for cervical spine metastasis by comparing the dosimetry of the target and organs at risk, specifically the spinal cord, between HA and VMAT and conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e58333b6db643587520938 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185497

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Dosimetric Evaluations of HyperArc and RapidArc in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for a Single Brain Metastasis2024 · 7 citations
2HyperArc performance in radiotherapy and its correlations with number and volume of multiple brain metastases2024 · 3 citations
3Transition From Manual to Automated Planning and Delivery of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Clinical, Dosimetric, and Quality Assurance ResultsOriginal Research · 2021 · 42 citations
4An Evaluation of the Feasibility and Utility of Automated HyperArc Planning for Multiple Brain Metastases: A Comparative Dosimetric Analysiss2025
5A Dosimetric Comparison of HyperArc Therapy Planning and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning in Treating Patients With Glioblastoma MultiformeOriginal Research · 2025 · 3 citations