Objective: We aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic type IV hiatal hernia repairs in elective and emergent settings and assess the feasibility of same-day surgery (SDS) in elective repairs. Methods: SDS was defined as discharge on the day of the procedure. The feasibility of SDS in elective repairs was assessed. Results: There were 265 primary type IV hernia repairs: 208/265 (78.5%) elective versus 57/265 (21.5%) in emergent settings, age:70.0 (64.0-75.0) versus 73.0 (60.8-82.0), P = .059, BMI: 30.1 (26.6-33.8) versus 27.5 (24.4-32.4), P = .025, ASA IV: 5/208 (2.4%) versus 11/57 (19.3%), P < .001, LOS:1 (0-2) versus 2 (1-4), P < .001, 30-day mortality: 0/208 (0.0%) versus 2/57 (3.5%), P = .046. SDS was planned in 83/208 (39.9%) elective procedures and performed in 65/83 (78.3%); 18/83 (21.7%) were transitioned from SDS to observation/inpatient. NGT was attempted in 18/57 (31.6%) in emergent setting and was successful in 5/5 at the bedside and 11/13 (84.6%) endoscopically. Ischemia was seen in 4/57 (7.0%) in emergent settings and perforation in 1/4. Time from surgical consultation to arrival to the OR in patients without ischemia/perforation/obstructive gastric volvulus (n = 50) was 57.9 hours (44.0-79.7) versus 5.5 hours (4.1-8.9) in those with, (n = 7). Conclusion: Type IV hiatal hernia can be repaired laparoscopically with good outcomes in elective and emergent settings and as SDS in elective repairs. Emergent presentations can occur in about 20% of type IV hernias in older patients with lower BMI and higher ASA. Ischemia/perforation are rare. Emergent presentations without ischemia/perforation can be treated with gastric decompression and urgent repair during the same admission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineau et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: