Key result
SPIRRIT-HFpEF evaluates whether MRAs reduce CV death and HF hospitalizations in ~2,400 HFpEF/HFmrEF patients.
Why the study?
Does spironolactone (or eplerenone) reduce cardiovascular deaths and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF?
RCT (n=2,400)
Open-label, blinded endpoint
1:1
Yes
Does spironolactone (or eplerenone) reduce cardiovascular deaths and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF?
The SPIRRIT-HFpEF trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of generic MRAs in HFpEF and HFmrEF using a pragmatic, registry-based randomized design.
Aims Benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) have not been established. Conventional randomized controlled trials are complex and expensive. The Spironolactone Initiation Registry Randomized Interventional Trial in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (SPIRRIT‐HFpEF) is a unique pragmatic registry‐based randomized controlled trial. Methods SPIRRIT‐HFpEF is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open‐label, blinded endpoint trial conducted on platforms in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) and the United States (US) Trial Innovation Network. Patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF are randomized 1:1 to spironolactone (or eplerenone) in addition to usual care, versus usual care alone. The primary outcome is total number of cardiovascular deaths and hospitalizations for heart failure. Outcomes are collected from Swedish administrative complete coverage registries and a US call centre and subsequently adjudicated. Simple eligibility criteria were based on data available in SwedeHF: heart failure as outpatient or at discharge from hospital, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide >300 ng/L (in sinus rhythm) or >750 ng/L (in atrial fibrillation), with pre‐specified adjustment for elevated body mass index, and chronic loop diuretic use. Power and sample size assessments were based on an event‐driven design allowing enrolment over approximately 6 years, and application of hazard ratios from the TOPCAT trial, Americas subset. The final sample size is expected to be approximately 2400 patients. Conclusion SPIRRIT‐HFpEF will be informative on the effectiveness of generic MRAs in HFpEF and HFmrEF, and on the feasibility of conducting pragmatic and registry‐based trials in heart failure and other chronic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lund et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) (n=2,400). Spironolactone (or eplerenone) vs. Usual care alone was evaluated on Total number of cardiovascular deaths and hospitalizations for heart failure. The SPIRRIT-HFpEF trial is designed to evaluate whether spironolactone or eplerenone reduces cardiovascular deaths and heart failure hospitalizations in approximately 2400 patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: