PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 7, 2025Sensors6 citationsOpen Access

Accuracy Assessment of iPhone LiDAR for Mapping Streambeds and Small Water Structures in Forested Terrain

View Full Paper
DKDominika KrauskováTMTomáš MikitaPHPetr Hrůza

Key Points

  • iPhone LiDAR achieves vertical RMSE of 0.16 m for mapping streambeds, indicating useful accuracy.
  • Retention structures mapped with average positional error of 7% show potential for smartphone applications.
  • Testing involved scanning workflows in rugged terrain with GNSS reference points every 20 m for validation.
  • Findings suggest smartphone LiDAR is effective for rapid mapping, yet limited in complex environments.

Abstract

Accurate mapping of small water structures and streambeds is essential for hydrological modeling, erosion control, and landscape management. While traditional geodetic methods such as GNSS and total stations provide high precision, they are time-consuming and require specialized equipment. Recent advances in mobile technology, particularly smartphones equipped with LiDAR sensors, offer a potential alternative for rapid and cost-effective field data collection. This study assesses the accuracy of the iPhone 14 Pro’s built-in LiDAR sensor for mapping streambeds and retention structures in challenging terrain. The test site was the Dílský stream in the Oslavany cadastral area, characterized by steep slopes, rocky surfaces, and dense vegetation. The stream channel and water structures were first surveyed using GNSS and a total station and subsequently re-measured with the iPhone. Several scanning workflows were tested to evaluate field applicability. Results show that the iPhone LiDAR sensor can capture landscape features with useful accuracy when supported by reference points spaced every 20 m, achieving a vertical RMSE of 0.16 m. Retention structures were mapped with an average positional error of 7%, with deviations of up to 0.20 m in complex or vegetated areas. The findings highlight the potential of smartphone LiDAR for rapid, small-scale mapping, while acknowledging its limitations in rugged environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krausková et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e585d0b1e78cc4e5f466afhttps://doi.org/10.3390/s25196141
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Crack detection limits in unit based masonry with terrestrial laser scanning2013 · 121 citations
  2. 2In-situ measurements from mobile platforms: An emerging approach to address the old challenges associated with forest inventories2018 · 135 citations
  3. 3Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration success2019 · 88 citations
  4. 4The effects of nearby trees on the positional accuracy of GNSS receivers in a forest environment2023 · 26 citations
  5. 5Reliability and limitations of a novel terrestrial laser scanner for daily monitoring of forest canopy dynamics2015 · 63 citations