⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

September 16, 2024

Supplementary Figure S4 from Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk factors for Korean women

Jihye Choi Tae-Woong Ha Hye‐Mi Choi Han‐Byoel Lee Hee-Chul Shin Woosung Chung Wonshik Han

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

The absolute risk was estimated using different combinations of PRS and NGRF risk levels. PRS was classified into three risk groups according to percentile distributions (0-20%: low, 20-80%: mid, 80-100%: high). NGRF score was classified into two groups divided at median (0-50%: low, 50-100%: high). The dotted lines represent the average risks. (A) Lifetime absolute risk (B) 5-year absolute risk

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e586b5b6db643587522cf4 https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.27029683.v1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Supplementary Figure S4 from Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk factors for Korean women2024
2Supplementary Figure S2 from Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk factors for Korean women2024
3Supplementary Figure S2 from Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk factors for Korean women2024
4Supplementary Figure S3 from Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk factors for Korean women2024
5Supplementary Figure S3 from Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk factors for Korean women2024