⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

September 16, 2024

Supplemental Figure S1 from Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening

Diane M. Harper Rye J. Anderson Ed Baker Tiffany M. Yu

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Supplemental Figure S1 shows tornado diagrams of range of results observed in the one-way sensitivity analyses

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Harper et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e586b5b6db64358752333b https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.27026969.v1

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Supplemental Figure S1 from Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening2024
2Supplemental Figure S2 from Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening2024
3Supplemental Figure S2 from Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening2024
4Supplemental Table S4 from Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening2024
5Supplemental Table S4 from Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening2024