Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The second film in what one might call Aaron Sorkin’s ‘Asshole Diptych’ (following 2010’s The Social Network) Steve Jobs engages with Apple’s controversial founder: a man whose legacy, as Sorkin’s screenplay voices, had more to do with building beautiful machines than being a beautiful person. This article argues that Sorkin’s innovative biopic approaches its complex subject (both Jobs, and Silicon Valley) via the artifice and intricacy of its own screenplay form: the portrait of an imperfect man, as a perfect cinematic machine. Departing from classical biopic’s focus on the narrative of a ‘life’, Steve Jobs’ three-part structure - focusing on three public product releases - aligns with the structural expectations of the classical screenplay, as well as acknowledging its theatrical setting and influence: the idea of Jobs as a performance. In the script’s various progressions and parallelisms, this article shows, Steve Jobs offers a self-consciously aesthetic rendition of a life seemingly ‘fixed’. Recognising that art is more perfect than its subject, Sorkin’s film encapsulates and potentially obviates the contradictions at play in Jobs - not unlike the ‘beautiful products’ for which Jobs is himself recognised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neil Archer (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: