According to the criteria of internal stability and the measure of consent, questionnaires for a comprehensive assessment of treatment adherence to CAA-25 for pregnant women and legal representatives of patients were evaluated. In a descriptive one-stage study involving 96 pregnant women in Omsk with at least one previously born child, the level of treatment adherence was determined using the CAA-25 questionnaire, using the CAA-25 MB and CAA-25 MH questionnaires, with an assessment of internal stability and consent measures. The CAA-25 MB questionnaire demonstrated good internal stability (α 0.900, ast 0.912) with high reliability (consistent exclusion of scale points preserves the validity of the questionnaire in the range 0.889-0.910), with almost perfect agreement (κ 0.913). The CAA-25 MH questionnaire demonstrated good internal stability (α 0.902, ast 0.922) with high reliability (consistent exclusion of scale points preserves the validity of the questionnaire in the range of 0.884-0.902), with almost perfect agreement (κ 0.909), it is advisable to use the tested questionnaires to assess comprehensive adherence to treatment of pregnant women and legal representatives of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreev et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: