Figure A1 (interactive version of Figure 7). Results of the geomorphic analysis of the northern Mayacamas Mountains. Use radio buttons to view sections A–D. (A) Channel steepness index map; elevated values are shown by brighter colors, and basin numbers 1 through 14 correspond to subfigures B and C, Figure 8, and mentions throughout the text. Hillshade is from NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (2013). (B) Chi map with brighter colors representing greater chi values; chi gradients are identified where adjacent basins have disparate chi values at their uppermost reaches. (C) Concavity index map displaying concavity results for each basin; lighter colors indicate lower concavity, labels are basin #: concavity value. (D) Geologic map presented in Figure 2 is included here for easy reference to identify areas where rock hardness may impact geomorphic results. Sp—sheared serpentinite lens; UCMA—Ukiah–Cow Mountain antiform; MMS—Middle Mountain Synform; WCF—Willow Creek Fault.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melosh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: