Objective Electroencephalogram neurofeedback training (EEG-NFT) is gaining popularity as a way of supporting emotional regulation following traumatic brain injury (TBI; Dehghani et al., 2023; Bezmaternykh et al., 2021; Rajeswaran and Bennett, 2019), as well as mental disorders defined in the DSM-5-TR (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022; Deiber et al., 2021; Micoulaud-Franchi et al., 2021; Neurofeedback Collaborative Group, 2023). EEG-NFT can extend well beyond TBIs and mental health disorders, especially in marginalized individuals facing ongoing trauma due to discrimination, hate crimes, and chronic stress as a result of frequent micro- and macroaggressions (Choi et al., 2022; Majeno et al., 2021; Moody and Lewis, 2019). One area not explored is the efficacy of EEG-NFT for individuals who have experienced racial or gender discrimination, especially if they are receiving training while continuing to experience microaggressions during the course of treatment. The authors commenced a review to determine (1) how often demographic data is shared in EEG-NFT research, (2) how frequently individuals who experience stigma enroll in neurofeedback, and (3) the efficacy of EEG-NFT specifically on marginalized individuals. Method Literature Review. Results Current literature reveals a deficiency in research amongst marginalized populations. Conclusions EEG-NFT shows promising results in emotional regulation for various mental disorders and TBIs, but there remains a significant gap in understanding its effectiveness for marginalized populations. The authors are moving forward with a detailed study, starting with an IRB proposal at Antioch University New England, to explore the efficacy of EEG-NFT in these underrepresented groups and plan to present preliminary results later this year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hutcherson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: