Objectives: The objectives of the study are to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of three bladder preservation regimens: radiotherapy alone (RT-alone group), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using gemcitabine plus platinum (GP-RT group), and low-dose gemcitabine (LD-Gem-RT group) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Methods: The three oncological outcomes, bladder-intact distant metastasis-free survival (BI-DMFS), cancer-specific survival, and overall survival (OS), were compared among RT alone (n = 10), GP-RT (n = 16), and LD-Gem-RT (n = 11) groups. Treatment-related adverse events were evaluated against the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). In the LD-Gem-RT group, time-course changes in the domains and scales related to the quality of life were evaluated by utilizing three questionnaires. Results: Age was significantly higher in the RT alone group (84 ± 7.2 years old) than in the GP-RT (74 ± 9.0) and LD-Gem-RT (75 ± 6.7) groups (P = 0.016). At a median follow-up of 26 months, the 2-year BI-DMFS rates were 80, 81, and 55% in the RT alone, GP-RT, and LD-Gem-RT groups, respectively, and the 2-year OS rates were 69, 62, and 81%, respectively. In the CRT groups, only the baseline CRP ≥ 1.0 mg/dL was associated with poor survival outcomes. Common early-onset adverse events included diarrhea, urinary frequency, and hematotoxicity. A questionnaire survey in the LD-Gem-RT group revealed patients experienced significant deterioration in the global health status/quality of life and the physical component summary score. Conclusion: We reported the oncological and functional outcomes of bladder preservation therapy using three different regimens, yielding acceptable outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyake et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: