Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We interpret the recent excess in a rare decay of the Higgs boson, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>H</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:mi>Z</a:mi><a:mi>γ</a:mi></a:math>, using a light axionlike particle (ALP) in the mass range 0.05–0.1 GeV. The dominant decay of such a light ALP is into a pair of collimated photons, whose decay is required to happen before reaching the ECAL detector, such that it mimics a single photon in the detector. It can explain the excess with a coupling <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:msubsup><d:mi>C</d:mi><d:mrow><d:mi>a</d:mi><d:mi>Z</d:mi><d:mi>H</d:mi></d:mrow><d:mi>eff</d:mi></d:msubsup><d:mo>/</d:mo><d:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</d:mi><d:mo>∼</d:mo><d:mn>4</d:mn><d:mo>×</d:mo><d:msup><d:mn>10</d:mn><d:mrow><d:mo>−</d:mo><d:mn>5</d:mn></d:mrow></d:msup><d:mtext> </d:mtext><d:mtext> </d:mtext><d:msup><d:mrow><d:mi>GeV</d:mi></d:mrow><d:mrow><d:mo>−</d:mo><d:mn>1</d:mn></d:mrow></d:msup></d:math>, while the decay of the ALP before reaching the ECAL requires the diphoton coupling <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msubsup><g:mi>C</g:mi><g:mrow><g:mi>γ</g:mi><g:mi>γ</g:mi></g:mrow><g:mi>eff</g:mi></g:msubsup><g:mo>/</g:mo><g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi><g:mo>≥</g:mo><g:mn>0.35</g:mn><g:mtext> </g:mtext><g:mtext> </g:mtext><g:msup><g:mi>TeV</g:mi><g:mrow><g:mo>−</g:mo><g:mn>1</g:mn></g:mrow></g:msup><g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo><g:mn>0.1</g:mn><g:mtext> </g:mtext><g:mtext> </g:mtext><g:mi>GeV</g:mi><g:mo>/</g:mo><g:msub><g:mi>m</g:mi><g:mi>a</g:mi></g:msub><g:msup><g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo><g:mn>2</g:mn></g:msup></g:math>. A potential test would be the rare decay of the <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi>Z</l:mi></l:math> boson <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:mi>Z</n:mi><n:mo stretchy="false">→</n:mo><n:mi>a</n:mi><n:msup><n:mi>H</n:mi><n:mo>*</n:mo></n:msup><n:mo stretchy="false">→</n:mo><n:mi>a</n:mi><n:mo stretchy="false">(</n:mo><n:mi>b</n:mi><n:mover accent="true"><n:mi>b</n:mi><n:mo stretchy="false">¯</n:mo></n:mover><n:mo stretchy="false">)</n:mo></n:math> at the Tera-<v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>Z</v:mi></v:math> option of the future FCC and CEPC. However, it has a branching ratio of only <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><x:mi>O</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo><x:msup><x:mn>10</x:mn><x:mrow><x:mo>−</x:mo><x:mn>12</x:mn></x:mrow></x:msup><x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo></x:math>, and thus barely testable. The production cross section for <bb:math xmlns:bb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bb:mi>p</bb:mi><bb:mi>p</bb:mi><bb:mo stretchy="false">→</bb:mo><bb:msup><bb:mi>Z</bb:mi><bb:mo>*</bb:mo></bb:msup><bb:mo stretchy="false">→</bb:mo><bb:mi>a</bb:mi><bb:mi>H</bb:mi></bb:math> via the same coupling <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:msubsup><fb:mi>C</fb:mi><fb:mrow><fb:mi>a</fb:mi><fb:mi>Z</fb:mi><fb:mi>H</fb:mi></fb:mrow><fb:mi>eff</fb:mi></fb:msubsup><fb:mo>/</fb:mo><fb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</fb:mi></fb:math> at the LHC is too small for detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheung et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: