In the developmental sciences, and social sciences in general, we are often interested in determining the effect of a specific intervention on a specific outcome. While randomized control trials allow for the investigation of such causal questions, the randomization of participants into particular conditions is often infeasible or unethical. Quasi-experimental designs provide an alternative, in which participants select their preferred condition but researchers retain some control over the implementation of a treatment. In this chapter, we use causal graphs to introduce the rationale of specific quasi-experimental designs and to discuss their causal assumptions. Causal graphs are a formal language for explicitly stating subject matter theory about a causal process and its implied causal assumptions. Additionally, we discuss potential validity threats in these designs that can reduce the credibility of causal claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheehan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: