Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and increasing healthcare costs. Accurate assessment tools are essential for managing LBP effectively.Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Low Back Outcomes Score (LBOS) and SF-36 questionnaire in assessing health status among patients with LBP across different age groups.Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 300 participants divided into age groups: 13-30 years, 31-50 years, and over 50 years. Data were collected using the SF-36 and LBOS questionnaires at baseline and two-year follow-up. The study measured physical, mental, and social functioning, and used statistical analysis, including regression models and Cronbach’s alpha, to evaluate internal consistency and correlation with international benchmarks.Results: The study found high internal consistency for LBOS (Cronbach’s alpha >0.7) with the lowest correlation for physical function (0.38). Significant improvements were observed across all SF-36 domains, except physical function (p < 0.05). LBOS scores showed a significant association with better psychological well-being, with mean scores of 74 (SD=55) in the excellent/good group versus 43 (SD=32) in the fair/poor group.Conclusion: LBOS and SF-36 are effective tools for assessing LBP outcomes, demonstrating good reliability and validity across different age groups in Pakistan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: