The Tibetan manuscript IOL Tib J 26 claims to contain a version of the Mahādeva narrative based on a Chinese source. In this paper, I identify this Chinese source as the Dasheng baifa mingmen lun kaizong yijue 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 (“Resolution [on How to] Clarify the Tenets of the Mahāyānaśatadharmaprakāśamukhaśāstra ,” T. 2812), an exegetical work on the * Mahāyānaśatadharmaprakāśamukhaśāstra , composed by the famous Dunhuang-based Chinese monk Tankuang 曇曠. The Resolution borrows a full version of the Mahādeva narrative from the Mahāvibhāṣā 阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論, casting it as the trigger of the first schism. I offer close readings and English translations of the relevant content of IOL Tib J 26 and the Resolution , not only to substantiate my identification, but also to offer an example of how native Chinese Buddhist texts were conveyed in Tibetan compositions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Channa Li (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: