This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The pericope of 1 Corinthians 11:17–34 has been a cornerstone in the theological understanding of the Eucharist. This study seeks to reevaluate conventional interpretations by concentrating on the primary rhetorical strategies employed within the passage, using contemporary argumentation analysis. It becomes apparent that Paul strategically utilizes the Eucharist narrative to underscore the imperative of correctly interpreting the term “body,” which he imbues with dual significance. The treatment of the members of Christ’s body in Corinth is intrinsically linked to the treatment of the Lord himself. Consequently, those who metaphorically and literally fracture his body will incur commensurate repercussions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thurén et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: