Within the Cluster of Excellence for Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Aviation (SE²A), technological advances to reduce carbon emissions of current propulsion architectures are investigated. In order to enhance the efficiency of the fan and compressor components of a turbofan engine during off-design operation, shape-adaptive fan and compressor blading is considered. This investigation introduces shape-adaptive blading for the fan stage of a V2500-A1 high-bypass turbofan engine, operated on Airbus A320 single-isle civil transport aircraft. Integrating piezoelectric actuators into the fan rotor blading allows varying the rotor twist and camber upon actuation. Special emphasis lies on an improvement of part-load operation, where lower efficiencies are expected and the surge-margin becomes more critical. During flight phases where the fan operates well outside its aerodynamic design point, a variable fan rotor shape allows reducing flow incidence and deviation. Especially during climb, where atmospheric conditions and engine thrust change with altitude, an improvement is shown. To assess the shape-morphing effects on the chosen aircraft configuration, previous morphing results are generalised and applied to the performance maps of the fan of the V2500-A1 turbofan engine. Within this investigation, two morphing configurations are considered and analysed on a whole mission-basis for three different flight scenarios. The morphing effect on the turbofan engine performance is quantified by combining structural morphing simulations with CFD simulations and a thermodynamic turbofan engine performance calculation tool. Special emphasis thereby lies on the mission specific fuel consumption (SFC) and the feasible fuel saving through introducing shape-adaptive fan blading. Results indicate, that small variations in blade angle already show an effect in SFC and motivate for future investigation of flight-phase optimised morphing strategies and application of the method to modern turbofan engines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seidler et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: