Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let MDol(X,G) denote the hyperkähler moduli space of G-Higgs bundles over a smooth projective curve X. In the context of four dimensional supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory, Kapustin and Witten introduced the notion of (BBB)-brane: boundary conditions that are compatible with the B-model twist in every complex structure of MDol(X,G). The geometry of such branes was initially proposed to be hyperkähler submanifolds that support a hyperholomorphic bundle. Gaiotto has suggested a more general type of (BBB)-brane defined by perfect analytic complexes on the Deligne–Hitchin twistor space Tw(MDol(X,G)). Following Gaiotto’s suggestion, this paper proposes a framework for the categorification of (BBB)-branes, both on the moduli spaces and on the corresponding derived moduli stacks. We do so by introducing the Deligne stack, a derived analytic stack with corresponding moduli space Tw(MDol(X,G)), defined as a gluing between two analytic Hodge stacks along the Riemann–Hilbert correspondence. We then construct a class of (BBB)-branes using integral functors that arise from higher non-abelian Hodge theory, before discussing their relation to the Wilson functors from the Dolbeault geometric Langlands correspondence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franco et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: