We thank Wallis and Martin [1] for their comments and additional analyses of the data we presented in our recent paper [2]. In essence, they argue that our finding of late-sighted children relying more on color cues than normally-sighted controls might be driven by a ceiling effect in the control data. Here, we describe why our original interpretation is justified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogelsang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: