The intrinsic low conductivity, low tap density, and huge volume expansion during lithium storage severely restrict the practicality of micron‐silicon suboxide (m‐SiO x ). Here, a carbon and MXene dual confinement and dense structural engineering strategy is proposed to construct m‐SiO x composites (m‐SiO x @C/MXene) through in situ carbon coating and electrostatic self‐assembly process. This integrated structural achieves a conductivity of 157 S cm −1 for m‐SiO x @C/MXene, which is 7 and 2 orders of magnitude higher than m‐SiO x (5.3 × 10 −5 S cm −1 ) and m‐SiO x @C (2.9 S cm −1 ), respectively. The tap density of m‐SiO x @C/MXene reaches 1.35 g cm −3 , significantly greater than that of m‐SiO x (0.82 g cm −3 ) and m‐SiO x @C (0.75 g cm −3 ). The 29% volume expansion of m‐SiO x @C/MXene during lithium storage is much lower than the 228% and 162% of m‐SiO x and m‐SiO x @C. The synergistic effect of the above advantages enables m‐SiO x @C/MXene to exhibit excellent rate performance and cycle stability. When assembled into a full cell with the LiFePO 4 (LFP) cathode, it features high capacity retention and energy density of 99.1% and 380 Wh kg −1 after 100 cycles at 0.2 C. This work provides new reference for the stable structural design of m‐SiO x or other materials with huge volume expansion during energy storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: