Human introduction of species around the world is not exhaustive. Comparing characteristics of non-native species that have been introduced with characteristics of non-native species that could be introduced can reveal biases in which species were introduced in the past, and can highlight future threats. We test for introduction biases in non-native trees introduced to Australia using a dataset of 57,958 tree species known globally. We found that: (1) non-native species were selectively introduced, and do not form a random subset of all non-native species, though (2) they do represent the functional trait-space occupied by tree species globally; (3) trees naturalised in numerous countries and introduced for more uses are more likely to be introduced in Australia; and (4) introduction debt can indicate characteristics of potential future non-native introductions. For Australia, tree species from the tropics and global south pose an especially high future invasion risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartlett et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: