Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Understanding causal effects is a fundamental goal of science and underpins our ability to make accurate predictions in unseen settings and conditions. While direct experimentation is the gold standard for measuring and validating causal effects, the field of causal graph theory offers a tantalizing alternative: extracting causal insights from observational data. Theoretical analysis has shown that this is indeed possible, given a large dataset and if certain conditions are met. However, biological datasets, frequently, do not meet such requirements but evaluation of causal discovery algorithms is typically performed on synthetic datasets, which they meet all requirements. Thus, real-life datasets are needed, in which the causal truth is reasonably known. In this work we first construct such a large-scale real-life dataset and then we perform on it a comprehensive benchmarking of various causal discovery methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuehua Zhu
University of Pittsburgh
Panayiotis V. Benos
University of Florida
Maria Chikina
University of Pittsburgh
Bioinformatics
University of Pittsburgh
University of Florida
Tsinghua University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59e9db6db643587539436 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae411