PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2024Journal of Animal Science0 citations

PSX-15 Effect of starch supplementation on rumen bacterial abundance in Bos taurus indicus steers consuming low-quality forage

View Full Paper
AFAlyson B FontenotMitchell InstituteJMJoshua C McCannUniversity of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignJCJodi R CoxMitchell Institute

Key Points

  • Starch supplementation altered bacterial genus abundances, with Butyrivibrio increasing at 20% and 38% starch, suggesting enhanced fibrolytic activity in Brahman steers.
  • Abundance of Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrvibrio shifted quadratically (P ≤ 0.04), while dominant phyla Firmicutes (83%) and Bacteroidata (10%) remained unchanged.
  • In a 4×4 Latin square study using five cannulated steers, full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed shifts in rumen microbiota despite decreased forage intake.

Abstract

Abstract Deficient ruminally available nitrogen caused by a basal diet of low-quality forage can limit microbial growth in the rumen and decrease forage utilization. Protein supplementation is well-documented to improve forage digestibility and performance. Additionally, starch has been evaluated to increase energy supply to grazing cattle when the forage cannot support adequate levels of production. However, most research in this area has been conducted in Bos taurus taurus, especially the response of the rumen microbiome to supplementation. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing starch supplementation on rumen bacterial populations in Bos taurus indicus steers supplemented protein and consuming low-quality forage. Ruminal samples were collected from five ruminally-cannulated Brahman steers (BW 420 ± 55 kg) used in a 4×4 Latin square fed a basal diet of King Ranch Bluestem Hay (3.5% CP and 73% NDF) provided ad libitum, and one of four isonitrogenous (130 mg N/kg BW) supplements with increasing levels of starch (2% starch= 100% soybean meal; 20% starch= 73% soybean meal, 26.2% corn, 0.8% urea; 38% starch = 47% soybean meal, 51.6% corn, 1.4% urea; 56% starch= 19% soybean meal, 78.6% corn, 2.4% urea). Rumen content samples were collected via rumen cannula at 4h post-feeding. Microbial DNA was extracted; full length 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were prepared using Kinnex kits and then sequenced on the PacBio Revio platform. Reads were analyzed using DADA2 and QIIME2. Statistical analysis was performed with the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Firmicutes, Bacteroidata, Actinobacteriota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Euryarchaeota were the most abundant phyla in all treatments (83, 10, 3, 0.4, and 1%, respectively), and were not affected by treatment (P ≥ 0.10). Christensenellaceae R-7 group, Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Lachnospiraceae-XPB1014-group, Butyrvibrio, Lachnospiraceae-NK3A20-group, and Prevotella represented the most abundant genera for all treatments (7, 5, 11, 9, 7, and 3%, respectively). Lachnospiraceae-XPB1014-group and Lachnospiraceae-NK3A20-group responded quadratically (P ≤ 0.02) to increasing starch with decreased abundance for the 20% and 38% starch supplement. Comparatively, relative abundance of Butyrvibrio responded quadratically (P 0.01) with increased abundance in the 20% and 38% starch supplement. Pseudobutyrvibrio increased with supplementation of 20% starch and then decreased as starch supplementation increased (quadratic, P = 0.04). In conclusion, supplementation of starch elicited changes in microbial relative abundance at the genus level with the response in Butyrivibrio suggesting greater fibrolytic activity. Forage and total digestible NDF intake in these steers decreased with increased starch supplementation; however, TDOMI was not affected by starch provision.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fontenot et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59fa7b6db64358753a04bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.841
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1PSX-14 Effect of starch supplementation on rumen bacterial abundance in Bos taurus taurus steers consuming low-quality forage2024
  2. 2PSIX-20 Effect of protein and starch level on N balance and ruminal fermentation parameters in steers consuming low-quality forage: Bos taurus indicus2024
  3. 3PSIX-19 Effect of protein and starch level on N balance and ruminal fermentation parameters in steers consuming low-quality forage: Bos taurus taurus2024
  4. 4401 Effect of protein and starch supplementation level on intake and digestibility by steers consuming low-quality forage: I. Bos taurus2024
  5. 593 Ruminal archaea and bacteria metatranscriptomic responses to supplementation in steers fed low-quality forage2024