This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The effective central charge (denoted by <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>eff</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>) is a measure of entanglement through a conformal interface, while the transmission coefficient (encoded in the coefficient <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>c</c:mi><c:mrow><c:mi>L</c:mi><c:mi>R</c:mi></c:mrow></c:msub></c:math> of the two-point function of the energy-momentum tensor across the interface) is a measure of energy transmission through the interface. It has been pointed out that these two are generally different. In this Letter, we propose the inequalities, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:mn>0</e:mn><e:mo>≤</e:mo><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>L</e:mi><e:mi>R</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo>≤</e:mo><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>eff</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo>≤</e:mo><e:mi>min</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>L</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo>,</e:mo><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>R</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo></e:mrow></e:math>. They have the simple but important implication that the amount of energy transmission can never exceed the amount of information transmission. We verify them using the AdS/CFT correspondence, using the perturbation method, and in examples beyond holography. We also show that these inequalities are sharp by constructing a class of interfaces that saturate them.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: