Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This paper examines the calculation of accelerated pension funds using two actuarial methods: the Individual Level Premium (ILP) method and the Projected Unit Credit (PUC) method. The case study focuses on PT. Dirgantara Indonesia. We compare the methods' impact on normal contribution amounts, actuarial liabilities, and retirement benefits. The research highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, considering factors like participant age and contribution period. The findings demonstrate that the PUC method generally leads to lower normal contributions but may result in lower final retirement benefits compared to the ILP method. This study provides valuable insights for companies and employees in PT. Dirgantara Indonesia to choose the most suitable method for their accelerated pension plan, considering their financial goals and risk tolerance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Rohman et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Loading...
International Journal of Global Operations Research
Padjadjaran University
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: