Objectives The purpose of this study is to analyze secondary school teacher’s subjective perceptions of online classes through the Q methodology and to categorize the results. Methods In this study, data were collected through literature review and individual surveys. From the collected data, 138 Q-populations were extracted using literature and in-depth interview data, and 31 Q-samples were established through an expert review process. Subsequently, a P-sample of 30 secondary school teachers from the Chungnam region was organized, and Q-sorting was conducted. Results The Q-sorting data were analyzed using the PQ Method program, resulting in the identification of four perception types. Conclusions Type A is a ‘limitation-aware type that focuses on problems.’ This type perceives online classes negatively and prefers maintaining the existing face-to-face class format. Type B is a ‘proactive coping type that affirms the effectiveness’, and this type is a type that recognizes the positive aspects of online classes and requires further activation of online classes. Type C is a ‘capacity development type that prioritizes teacher ability.’ This type does not deny the advantages of online classes, but finds it difficult to develop the competencies necessary for online classes. Type D is a ‘future education type that focuses on development.’ This type recognizes online classes as a major trend in future education and requires students to actively prepare for online classes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: