Objective: To assess the advantage and feasibility of fresh single blastocyst transfer (SBT) with the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single center study. Population: Patients (n=4760) received first cycle of GnRH-ant protocol. Methods: The embryological and clinical outcomes were compared between SBT and day-3 double embryo transfer (DET) groups. A nomogram model was constructed and validated. Main Outcome Measures: Live birth rate (LBR). Results: The SBT and DET groups had comparable clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (49.8% vs. 51.7%) and LBR (41.6% vs. 45.2%). For good-quality embryos, SBT and DET subgroup also had comparable CPR (61.6% vs. 57.1%) and LBR (52.7% vs. 50.9%). For patients ≥ 30 years, SBT group showed significantly higher implantation rate than DET group (30–34 years: 52.8% vs. 32.5%, P < 0.001; ≥ 35 years: 41.8% vs. 28.4%, P = 0.039). The SBT group showed significantly lower multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) than DET group (2.60% vs. 34.3%, P < 0.001). A nomogram model was constructed based on six significant independent predictors (age, gonadotropin starting dose, number of retrieved oocytes, fertilized oocytes, day-3 available embryos, and day-3 good-quality embryos) to predict the possibility of blastocyst formation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the training set and validation set was 85.2% (95% CI: 0.839–0.866) and 84.0% (95% CI: 0.819–0.860), respectively. Conclusions: The SBT strategy can guarantee favorable CPR, LBR and low MPR. Additionally, the nomogram model could be promising in terms of helping physicians to design individualized ET strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: