In this scientific work, the author briefly analyzes some current problems of philosophical rethinking of the relationship between artificial intelligence and the human mind. To do this, the author briefly examines the essence, features, and advantages of introducing AI into practice, and focuses on the disadvantages of using such a tool in its various forms. Next, the author presents his own recommendations for implementing an effective philosophical rethinking of the relationship between artificial intelligence and the human mind. In conclusion, the author writes about the importance of carrying out such actions now, since there is a significant amount of work ahead, the relevance of which is becoming more and more obvious every day. The object of this scientific research is the current problems of philosophical rethinking of the relationship between artificial intelligence and the human mind. The purpose of this scientific research is a comprehensive, consistent analysis of current problems of philosophical rethinking of the relationship between artificial intelligence and the human mind. Methods of this scientific research: dialectical, comparative analysis, statistical, mathematical, generalization, concretization, systematization, deduction, other methods of theoretical and practical levels of scientific knowledge. The scientific novelty of this scientific research lies in the preparation of a comprehensive study, the formation of the author’s conclusions regarding current problems of philosophical rethinking of the relationship between artificial intelligence and the human mind. This scientific article will be useful to theorists, practitioners, students and teaching staff, as well as a wide range of readers interested in the problems and prospects for the development of ICT and AI in modern Russian and world practice, a philosophical rethinking of the relationship between man and AI in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Naumov (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: