Limiting training data in low-resource languages is a barrier to Natural Language Processing (NLP). Regardless, languages with thousands of users worldwide require improved NLP capabilities. The Table-to-Text task—typically develops natural language descriptions using data tables, tests model reasoning abilities—although it is especially tough in multi-language settings. System output frequently lack credit to their underlying data. Intermediate planning strategies—which include Question-Answer (QA) blueprints—improving summarization tasks by presenting related QA pair prior to verbalization. Therefore, this study analyses whether QA blueprints improve multilingual Table-to-Text output attribution. An enlarged multilingual dataset, encompassing African languages, contains QA blueprints that were produced and filtered heuristically. This dataset is used to fine-tune sequence-to-sequence model (transformers)—both with and without blueprints. Two configurations are evaluated—English reference blueprints with language target verbalization and modified blueprints. These results show that English-only models benefit from blueprints, whereas multi language models cannot. Errors in machine-translating blueprints provide challenges, as do models that rely on their generated blueprints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arpita Soni (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: