Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: The problem of detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) remains an issue. Thus, screening tools have received increased attention. We assessed the performance of the Prodromal Questionaire-16 (PQ-16) and the Perceptual and Cognitive Aberrations scale (PCA) to screen for UHR in the general population of Sao Paulo. Methods: Individuals aged 18-35 years (n=6500) were interviewed with the PQ-16 and the PCA. Those with a combined score>10 on the PQ-16+BS were called for assessment with the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS). 75 individuals were deemed as UHR and 99 as healthy comparison; 44 randomly selected individuals (PQ-16+PCA scores<10) joined as further controls. All participants had no DSM-5 diagnosis. Scores of the PCA, PQ-16 (total score and distress index), and their combinations were analyzed. Results: All the proposed scorings significantly distinguished between UHR and control subjects. PQ-16 scoring showed the best performance (AUC=0.711), followed by the PQ-16+PCA combination (AUC=0.700). PQ-16 distress index had the worst performance. Conclusions: Data provides further evidence for the use of the PQ-16 as an effective screening instrument to search for UHR states in the general population. This can help UHR identification, reduce delays in care, while minimizing the risk of false positives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: