Indirect restorations are a staple restorative option in dentistry due to their versatility, exceptional aesthetics, and desirable strength and longevity. Metal ceramics and all ceramics are the material of choice for permanent restorations but come with certain disadvantages, such as chipping, fracture, and wear of the antagonist tooth or restoration. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and indirect composite resins are commonly used materials due to their favourable properties for temporary restorations, but lately, they have been chosen as the restorative material of choice for implant-supported full-mouth rehabilitations. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the colour stability and surface roughness of PMMA and indirect composite resins under both ageing and non-ageing conditions. This would greatly help a clinician in choosing materials depending on the clinical scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narde et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: