Objective: Validate diagnostic accuracy of new unique biomarker, gastrointestinal myoelectrical activity (GIMA), detected by electroviscerography (EVG) with Ai-derived disease threshold score calculation to noninvasively diagnose endometriosis. Design: Multicenter prospective blinded trial Setting: Women's Healthcare Center Population of Sample: 165 patients with and without endometriosis diagnosis Methods: Initial 50 patients meeting inclusion criteria in 165-patient multicenter prospective GIMA biomarker trial were selected for interim analysis. Study population included women 27-55 years old, 25 with diagnosis of endometriosis and 25 non-endometriosis controls. Clinical and GIMA data were collected between February 2007 and September 2017, at all harvesting time points and frequency bands using EVG. Ai-derived threshold score calculations used area under the curve (AUC), age and standardized pain scores variables. Main Outcome Measures: Specificity, sensitivity, NPV, PPV and predictive probability or C-Statistic from logistical regression analyses of all AUC frequency and time points. Results: Non-endometriosis versus endometriosis cohort interim analysis differed significantly (p<0.001) for median (IQR), AUC values, and percent frequency power distribution at baseline, 10-minute, 20-minute, and 30-minute post water-load at frequency ranges 15-20cpm, 30-40cpm, 40-50cpm and 50-60cpm. GIMA threshold scoring revealed sensitivity and PPV of 96%, specificity and NPV of 96% and C-statistic of 100%. Ai-derived GIMA biomarkers threshold scoring predicted 25/25 subjects positive and negative for endometriosis, with surgical confirmation. Hormonal therapy, surgical stage, age nor pain score affected diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: EVG GIMA biomarker data with Ai-derived threshold scoring accurately distinguished participants with and without endometriosis. This interim analysis supports continued investigation of GIMA biomarkers to diagnose endometriosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: