This development research aims to produce a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)-based e-module to determine the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of a STEM-based physics e-module on the topic of work and energy for 10th-grade students. The research design used in this study was research and development (R&D) using the ADDIE model to develop the e-module on the topic of work and energy based on STEM. The population and sample of this study were 10th-grade students at SMAN 1 Deli Tua, and the sample consisted of 10th-grade students in the MIA 3 class at SMAN 1 Deli Tua. Based on the data analysis, the results of expert validation yielded a material expert validation score of 88.16% with a category of very feasible, and a media expert validation score of 90.7% with a category of very feasible. The results of the practicality test on a small scale showed that the ease aspect obtained a percentage of 91.3%, the attractiveness aspect obtained a percentage of 91.8%, and the usefulness aspect obtained a percentage of 90.2%. The results of the large-scale trial showed that the e-module obtained a highly practical category, reaching 92.6%. The ease aspect obtained a percentage of 93.2%, the attractiveness aspect obtained a percentage of 94%, and the usefulness aspect obtained a percentage of 90%. Both small and large-scale tests yielded a highly practical category. The effectiveness test showed that the average pre-test score obtained by students was 37.66, and the average post-test score was 89.6%. Based on the N-gain test, it was found that the average N-gain score of students was 0.84 or 83.94%, which is interpreted as having high effectiveness. Therefore, the product developed in this study is considered feasible, practical, and effective in supporting students' self-directed learning process on the topic of work and energy and can improve students' learning outcomes
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Situmorang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: