Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that anodal tDCS over the motor cortex and cerebellum enhances balance and shooting accuracy in elite ice hockey players, suggesting its utility for athletic training.
Purpose : To investigate the effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellum on balance control and shooting accuracy in elite ice hockey players. Methods : Twenty-one elite ice hockey players underwent anodal tDCS over the M1 (a-tDCS M1 ), anodal tDCS over the cerebellum (a-tDCS CB ), concurrent dual-site anodal tDCS over the M1 and the cerebellum (a-tDCS M1+CB ), and sham stimulation (tDCS SHAM ). Before and after receiving tDCS (2 mA for 15 min), participants completed an ice hockey shooting-accuracy test, Pro-Kin balance test (includes stance test and proprioceptive assessment), and Y-balance test in randomized order. Results : For static balance performance, the ellipse area in the 2-legged stance with eyes open and the 1-legged stance with the dominant leg significantly improved following a-tDCS M1 , a-tDCS CB , and concurrent dual-site a-tDCS M1+CB , compared with tDCS SHAM (all P < .05, Cohen d = 0.64–1.06). In dynamic balance performance, the average trace error of the proprioceptive assessment and the composite score of the Y-balance test with the dominant leg significantly improved following a-tDCS M1 and concurrent dual-site a-tDCS M1+CB (all P < .05, Cohen d = 0.77–1.00). For the ice hockey shooting-accuracy test, shooting-accuracy while standing on the unstable platform significantly increased following a-tDCS M1 ( P = .010, Cohen d = 0.81) and a-tDCS CB ( P = .010, Cohen d = 0.92) compared with tDCS SHAM . Conclusion : tDCS could potentially be a valuable tool in enhancing static and dynamic balance and shooting accuracy on unstable platforms in elite ice hockey players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: