Systematic review and meta-analysis constitute a staple of evidence-based medicine, an obligatory step in developing the guideline and recommendation document. It is a formalized process aiming at extracting and summarizing knowledge from the published work, grading, and considering the quality of the included studies. It is very laborious and time-consuming. Therefore, the meta-analyses are rarely updated and seldom living, decreasing their utility with time. Here, we present a framework for integrating the large language models and natural language processing techniques applied to the previously published systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of the point of care tests. We show that the framework can be used to automate the screening step of the existing meta-analyses with minimal costs to quality and, to a large extent, the extraction step while maintaining the strict nature of the systematic review process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Górska et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: