A rare case of ABO grouping discrepancy due to probable blood group switching which presented as lost antigens detectable only with indigenous reagents in less sensitive platforms compared to highly sensitive automated platforms using non indigenous reagents

Abstract: Blood group switching in the form of loss or diminished expression of RBC antigens has been reported in malignancies and infections. Blood group antigens are present on the red cell surface. ABO blood group system is the most clinically significant system. Some cases can present as grouping discrepancy. Here we present a rare case of ABO grouping discrepancy due to probable blood group switching which presented as lost antigens detectable only with indigenous reagents in less sensitive platforms compared to highly sensitive automated platforms using non indigenous reagents. 66 year old female whose historic blood group was A Rh D positive with history of uneventful transfusion of 2 units of A Rh D positive packed red cell one and half years back now presented with mycoplasma pneumonia and acute pulmonary edema. On routine complete blood count testing her hemoglobin was 3.6 gm%, request send to blood bank for pretransfusion testing. Testing performed via conventional tube technique and ABO blood group discrepancy was noted with forward grouping turned to be A Rh D positive (positive reaction with anti A1 lectin) and on reverse grouping 3+ reactions was observed in both A and B cell giving a picture of O blood group. Blood grouping was performed in different platforms including fully automated, semi automated and manual using commercially available antisera and human plasma as a source of anti A, anti B antibodies for forward grouping. The antisera used in automated platforms are non indigenous and that for manual are indigenous. Discrepancy was noted (Forward A and Reverse O) in CTT with commercially available antisera and human plasma as reagents for forward grouping .The same discrepancy was noted with CAT in neutral card with commercially available antisera for manual grouping. But when grouping performed with Column Agglutination Technology using matrix grouping gel card the discrepancy was resolved reporting the blood group as O. For further confirmation we repeated the blood grouping in another fully automated platform, SPRCA Technology (Immucore NEOIRIS) and in that also no discrepancy noted giving a picture of O group. This patient probably had undergone a blood group switching from A to O by losing some but not all A epitopes and started anti A antibody production. Some A epitopes which were not lost had been picked up by the commercially available antisera intended for manual grouping. These antisera are indigenous in origin. Also when human plasma was used as source of antibodies the A epitopes which were not lost were detected. But when grouping was done with non-indigenous antisera in both manual and automatic platform the A epitopes were not detected. This case points towards the relevance of incorporating indigenous antisera in automated platforms.