Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract It develops a differential game model of a fuel car supply chain in which consumers' low fuel consumption, green preferences, and government subsidies promote manufacturers' investment in fuel‐consumption reduction technologies (FCRT); the price, the fuel consumption per mile, and the retailer's marketing efforts jointly determine the demand for the product. There are four game scenarios constituted by ex ante or ex post government that subsidizes and shares or does not share marketing costs. The results show that ex ante and ex post subsidies can incentivize investment in FCRT. However, the preferable subsidy model depends on the parameter values; the manufacturer‐led marketing cost‐sharing contract results in supply chain coordination.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b8abb6db64358755178b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4365
Yongxi Yi
University of South China
Meng Zhang
Zhejiang A & F University
Yuqiong Li
University of South China
Managerial and Decision Economics
University of South China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...